Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Archives/Unsuccessful Nominations/August 2014

Archived August 3rd
This Annie Award-winning feature (predominantly won by Disney and Pixar films over the years) has a very sub-par article.--Coin945 (talk) 09:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Support NorthAmerica1000 09:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose This isn't notable enough for TAFI --  CFCF  (talk · contribs · email) 09:51, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Archived August 27
A well-known subject (75 year old animated franchise about fighting cat and mouse), article has needed some significant attention for quite some time. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 00:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose To large for TAFI in my view. --  CFCF  🍌 (email) 09:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Support It'd be great. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:43, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. While developed, some room for improvement exists in the article, upon which it could attain B-class status. NorthAmerica1000 03:50, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Support--Coin945 (talk) 15:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Nom, would be merged with Selling. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 17:27, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment While it could be an interesting project for TAFI, consensus would need to be found for the merge first. CSJJ104 (talk) 22:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - David Condrey (talk) 11:34, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - --  CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Nom. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 17:27, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Support -- Horai  551 03:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Support--Coin945 (talk) 15:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - David Condrey (talk) 11:34, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose - --  CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Nom -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 02:06, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Support--Coin945 (talk) 15:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - David Condrey (talk) 11:34, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - --  CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Nom. David Condrey (talk) 11:42, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - a specialized software engineering book that is unlikely to appeal to many editors. NorthAmerica1000 11:26, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Support --Melody Lavender (talk)


 * Nominated by NorthAmerica1000 06:57, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - David Condrey (talk) 11:42, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Support --Melody Lavender (talk)


 * Nominated by NorthAmerica1000 16:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - David Condrey (talk) 11:42, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coin945 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - David Condrey (talk) 11:28, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Support --Melody Lavender (talk)


 * Nominated by NorthAmerica1000 06:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Support -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 16:20, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - David Condrey (talk) 11:28, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Nom- Article with two improvement tags.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  11:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Support--Coin945 (talk) 15:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - David Condrey (talk) 11:28, 17 August 2014 (UTC)