Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2015/3

Stationery
Approved - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It needs a good amount of expansion. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 23:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Support. NorthAmerica1000 14:42, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Support.  Bananasoldier  (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Who wants to vote for this article? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Elmo
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I searched for Elmo and expected a well-developed article but there is just not good development there. There is not even a picture of Elmo himself. Poor guy, like all other characters in Sesame Street have a picture. That sucks for him. Help the article? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 02:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - very bad development. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 07:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Badminton
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Needs improvement. For example, several sections are entirely unsourced. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I tend to enjoy the look of improved articles as majorly expanded articles. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Island
approved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Has significant potential for improvement and expansion. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 02:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Sure. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 23:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Technobabble

 * Nominated by N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - it seems not well known and I never heard such weird stuff. I tend to enjoy seeing popular articles get expanded. Popular article and well-known subject expansion is what I like best. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - if you don't understand my oppose comment, then ask me. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Not meaning to suggest anything but curiosity here, but I'm fairly surprised that you've never heard of this term or subject before. I've heard it referenced (at the least) many hundreds if not thousands of times over the last few decades -- usually with regard to sloppily-written fiction, but also in the vein of fringe science or academia and increasingly in more mundane/day-to-day technical circumstances. My concern is whether or not we can really expand the topic substantially.  The articles seems to presently capture the meaning of the concept pretty well (and is decently written, in my opinion).  Further, expanding it too far with specifics will, I fear, invite fans of particular sci-fi franchises to start loading it with all manner of fan cruft.  S n o w  talk 05:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Which audiences would know such stuff? General audiences? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'd say general audiences are familiar with the phenomena to varying extents, though certainly it is a more pronounced phenomena in areas of speculative fiction (and science fiction in particular).


 * But with regard to sourcing, we might actually find more coverage of the topic in sources regarding psuedo-science and fringe (or just poorly approached) academia, where it has increasingly become a concern, and not just in highly technical fields -- in the last couple of decades some areas the social sciences have been noted for having become increasingly inundated with work that relies on highly insular and often borderline-indecipherable idiolects that attempt to up-jump pet theories (or the impression of empirical rigor) via the application of needlessly complex jargon. The cognitive scientist/popular science writer Steven Pinker has spoken on this topic at length (most notably in The Blank Slate and more recently in The Sense of Style), as have other academics.  Mind you, this is a somewhat different animal from either a fiction writer using convenient language without having much understanding of the science upon which it refers, or a dubious application of scientific language that garners support amongst non-expert enthusiasts of some fringe theory, but the contexts are related and the term "technobabble" itself can be (and has been) applied to all three varieties of scenario.


 * Again, I don't know that I think the article requires a great deal of attention just now -- arguably the academic context could be explored in more detail, but that's going to require careful sourcing and wording to avoid WP:OR concerns.  But just by way of answering your question, I think the term has a fair degree of recognition.   S n o w  talk 08:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - you may support this article if you wanted to. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Audio editing software
approved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It is a stub and is not developed adequately. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support – plenty of opportunities for expansion here. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 07:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:27, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support ; CSJJ104 (talk) 22:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Vending machine
approved Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Needs a lot more improvement. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 02:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 13:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Lunch
Approved Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 00:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Needs more refs and has OR problems. very important subject with potential. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 23:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support, although I am not sure if this nomination is already on the Holding Area. I hope it is not already in the holding area. Good luck! Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support --CSJJ104 (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Religious philosophy
Approved Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * A very minimal stub at this time. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 22:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - very true. Sounds important. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support, quite strongly. It doesn't only sound important, it is important. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 21:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Chick-fil-A same-sex marriage controversy
not approved 3 opposes equals no to this one. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose, controversial subject, plus it looks well reffed and pretty informational to me. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 19:44, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - I am not sure if this is suitable for me. And plus, this does not feel like something important. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Firewood
. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 09:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nominated by N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - of course, even though I have no knowledge of firewood. Yes, needs more citations too. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Hors d'oeuvre
✔️. There is already an article called Hors d'oeuvre in the Holding area right now! Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Has significant potential for improvements and expansion. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Crème brûlée
✅. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nice subject, needs expanding, notice that this is viewed more often than cheeseburger. (Keep in mind I may be biased, I make Crème brûlée every Thanksgiving) -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 22:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support for the high page hits. --31.48.13.115 (talk) 20:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Christ the Redeemer selfie
. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose, I don't think this is important enough to be a TAFI. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 22:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - however, we could do this outside of TAFI. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose – Nomination withdrawn. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Coastal Corporation
, no comments in over 3 weeks - Evad37 &#91;talk] 02:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

The Hunger Games
✅. The article is improved enough to equal a TAFI. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * That article is about the franchise. If you look inside, a lot of things are missing. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - if you don't believe me, check here.
 * 1) Support. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 16:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - ranked 247th in Wikipedia traffic. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 23:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose too large for TAFI. -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - wait, this is already improved by the writers of this ariticle. I had told them to improve it. Before, it was a major issue with the size; now it has expanded by over 18,000 bytes within a week and so it is already improved majorly. Just more pictures is necessary. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

. This article's underdevelopment has now been solved. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Turkish cuisine
, no comments in over 3 weeks - Evad37 &#91;talk] 02:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

List of brand name snack foods

 * Expandable article. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - better list and citations. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Strong oppose General oppose including lists on TAFI. Specific oppose on grounds it will never be complete, and will only serve to increase WP:SysBias --  CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - do you think a strong oppose would equal 2 opposes? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Definitely not. One oppose is one oppose, regardless of adverb used. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

. I withdraw this nomination. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Watercolor painting

 * A (weakish) C-class level-4 vital article that would benefit from more sources, copy editing, expansion, organization and more. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - although the content is all right, the reference style needs total updating. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose – fixing reference styles is out of scope of this project -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Fixing referencing styles is not out of scope. TAFI's scope is literally "improve articles to Good article, Featured article or Featured list quality" – all of which have standards for referencing - Evad37 &#91;talk] 07:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Well to rephrase it, I think we're going to get fewer volunteers when the work largely consists of checking old content instead of writing new content. I'm willing to support the entry if it can be shown or even suggested that the article can be improved in other ways. -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 08:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * . Not much support here, so I withdraw the nomination. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

List of Brazilian drinks
. No support, withdraw nom. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Expandable article. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 14:58, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose General oppose including lists on TAFI. -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Huntington Park, California
. I withdraw the nomination. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:33, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose Too specific for TAFI. -- CFCF  🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Report
approved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 13:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Poorly written, and needing a huge amount and variety of different improvements. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 23:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support --CSJJ104 (talk) 12:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Peptide T
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Single-origin coffee
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 20:44, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Gourmand
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 18:06, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Finnish bread


Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 02:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Garlic soup
unapproved - been too long since last mention. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:14, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - too small for satisfaction. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Bread soup
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - too small for satisfaction. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Petit-Beurre
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Glycerin soap
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 05:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support.  Bananasoldier  (talk) 02:48, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Caribbean region of Colombia
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Konstantin Bogaevsky
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:16, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Television in Russia
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:28, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 22:23, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Chandelier
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Important subject, multiple problem tags. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 23:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:17, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - I would say the definitions one is not looking as pretty as I expected. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Artisan cheese


Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Morzin Palace
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 22:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Ornamental plant
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 05:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Floriculture


Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 02:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - yes, and French Wikipedia has some useful information. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Bioenergy
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:36, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - it does need development. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 07:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support, in need of improvement. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 02:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Fan (person)
Unapproved. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Plenty of potential and options for improvement. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Big potential. More interest, more citations, more expansion. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support, big problems, big potential. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 23:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Caramel
Approved. North America1000 12:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a shame such a tasty thing is start class and has ref problems. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 22:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 09:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - needs further work - 115.188.176.132 (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Cheeseburger
Approved. North America1000 12:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm surprised this article is so small. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 22:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - very well-known. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - I would agree. 115.188.176.132 (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Salzburger Nockerl


Unapproved. North America1000 12:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support, needs work. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 22:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Okra soup
Unapproved. North America1000 12:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Central European cuisine
Unapproved. North America1000 12:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 22:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Artisan
Unapproved. North America1000 12:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * A comprehensive topic that does not presently have comprehensive coverage in the article. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Types of chocolate
Approved. North America1000 12:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * This article has inadequate information about baking chocolate even though "baking chocolate" redirects there. Also, there needs more improvements. Comments if you can think of more improvements. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 09:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Support - there is just no information about baking chocolate and its uses. 115.188.176.132 (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - how to improve... Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Caribbean natural region
Unapproved. North America1000 12:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 14:50, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Evad37 &#91;talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Dennis the Wild Bull
Unapproved. North America1000 12:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Specialty foods
Unapproved. North America1000 12:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:27, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - special article needed Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Astroland
Unapproved. North America1000 12:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:11, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Employment
Unapproved. North America1000 12:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * There is only a sentence or two for each section, and a one-line lead. Given the prevalence of the topic in the real world, there really ought to be a decent article about it.  Rcsprinter123    (chew)  @ 21:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Health food store
Unapproved. North America1000 12:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * C-class article (on the weak side of C-class) that presently has only one source. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Adventure travel


Unapproved. North America1000 12:21, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Prison cemetery
Unapproved. North America1000 12:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 02:52, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Emergency management
Unapproved. North America1000 12:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Tagged with several maintenance templates. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 02:32, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Bo-taoshi


Unapproved. North America1000 12:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

A-list
Unapproved. North America1000 12:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:00, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Cue sports


Unapproved. North America1000 12:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:44, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Horse racing
Unapproved. North America1000 12:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:42, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Dodgeball
Unapproved. North America1000 12:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nom: N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Support -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 23:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 08:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)