Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2016/11

Biodegradable plastic
For some reason it redirects to bioplastic, the link is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodegradable_plastic ✅ Red olta 📱 Cont ribs 17:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Needs significant improvement, very messy article in general 172.97.129.251 (talk) 23:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:29, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Support per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Support per nom. Red olta 📱 Cont ribs 17:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Skipping rope

 * Popular toy. Coin945 (talk) 09:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom--BabbaQ (talk) 14:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Support per nom - Could do with some sources & improvements, – Davey 2010 Talk 18:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - I never realized it was a B class - Better off improving a stub or c class. – Davey 2010 Talk 11:59, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose As it is already B-Class. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 00:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose as is B class. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose For it is B class, and therefore doesn't need a whole week of improvement. Ratto33 (talk) 19:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)


 * &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  20:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Ezbet el-Borg
 Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   08:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Although far from being a popular article, the Egyptian coastal city of Ezbet el-Borg was the 4 millionth article on the English Wikipedia. I also suspect that Ezbet had an important role in the Fifth Crusade but I cannot be sure. Greenshed (talk) 03:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Support per nom--BabbaQ (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Support - Could do with some expansion, improving and sourcing. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:30, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose as per below - I hadn't checked the pageviews - If the article has low views then it's not worth spending an entire week on it. – Davey 2010 Talk 11:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose needs work but pageviews are far too low. Sorry. Our time is surely better spent on subjects more interesting to the general public. A milestone article does not give weight, I'm afraid &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  21:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose Pageviews are very very low, as MusikAnimal said. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 00:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose per low pageviews. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)