Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2020/7

Carbon dioxide

 * The article requires updating and expansion from many different perspectives (biology, climate, industry). Femke Nijsse (talk) 15:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:24, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

(automated closure) No further input after 21 days &mdash;  MusikBot talk 04:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Paris Agreement

 * Various things, language, external links in body, a criticism section that needs to be spread over sections instead of be separate. Femke Nijsse (talk) 15:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Article could use a lot of help. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 04:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) Support - Article in need of our help.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

(automated closure) No further input after 21 days &mdash;  MusikBot talk 04:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Raff & Gammon

 * Article needs expanding, which is possible because of it's reliable sourcing, so I am nominating for TAFI. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 07:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Seems to be getting only 45 views over 30 days. Femke Nijsse (talk) 10:10, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Per nom. Article needs our help.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

(automated closure) No further input after 21 days &mdash;  MusikBot talk 04:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Human history

 * The level-1 vital history article is not anywhere near as good as it should be. WP:RECENTISM issues have resulted in discrepancies such as covering 9/11 but not the Spanish flu (or COVID-19, if you're curious). There are tons of ultra-long footnotes going off into tangents about environmentalism. It's in a higher class than most articles at this project, but I think it's a page where everyone could find something to improve. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 23:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

(automated closure) No further input after 21 days &mdash;  MusikBot talk 04:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Double-barrelled name

 * I came across this article and felt that it could be tightened up. Some examples: (a) section Iberian tradition doesn't explain within the text that it's about Iberian tradition; (b) in the same section, the sentence beginning "Toponymic family..." is clearly missing a word or words; (c) a number of red links; (d) lengthy, wordy sections; (e) some technical/specialized terms or concepts could probably be explained more.  In general, it seemed that there's a lot that could be improved. Jkgree (talk) 16:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

(automated closure) No further input after 21 days &mdash;  MusikBot talk 04:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

History of music

 * It's classed as C, but this level-3 vital article looks to be in pretty rough shape. Was TAFI way back in 2013, but clearly still needs more. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 22:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

(automated closure) No further input after 21 days &mdash;  MusikBot talk 04:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:About

 * This is a bit of an unconventional nom, but this page really needs it. It's the main reader-focused (as opposed to editor-focused) introduction to Wikipedia, and is linked from the left sidebar, but is just way too long, too similar to Wikipedia, and lacking in a ton of other regards. Editors would have no trouble at all finding lots to improve. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 08:18, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Support - Missing info.  Kori das  talk?   02:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

(automated closure) No further input after 21 days &mdash;  MusikBot talk 04:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)