Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Message board/Topics/Archive 4

Summary of August '06 meeting
The Archive for the August 2006 meeting can be found at AMA Meeting/August 2006.

New Coordinator Election Advocacy Handbook Rewrites a comment on the section header 'discussion'  Advocacy Alerts System of Accountability Notes on the above (filling out forms) Standard terminology Deputy Coordinators Election Officers Further WP:AMARQ streamlining
 * Result: Steve was elected as the official coordinator with a vote of 10/0/0.
 * Result: Pedant volunteered and made quality additions to the documentation as well as an example of case documentation. Further case studies may be a good thing to investigate and include.
 * Result: Pedant brought up an issue of style concerning the heading "Discussion" which will be implemented in the next Meeting.
 * Result: Not enough discussion.
 * Result: General consensus that a System of Accountability needs to be implemented without ex post facto enforcements. General consensus believes that peer review seems to be the best way to do this. Geo created an example system at AMA_Meeting/review. This item requires further discussion.
 * Result: General consensus that mandatory forms to fill out is a bad thing. Case histories, however, may be a good thing to keep (for difficult cases and provided they are not mandatory) and Pedant demonstrated how a simple case history could be put together.
 * Result: The term "Advocee" is what was generally decided on to refer to a Wikipedian who has requested Advocacy.
 * Result: Aeon and Wikiwoohoo were instated as Deputy Coordinators.
 * Result: May be useful in the future. Further discussion needed as no consensus on how to proceed was reached.
 * Result: General consensus that the streamlining process is a good idea. Steve working on new implementation at Category:AMA Requests for Assistance.

Topics from December '06 Meeting

 * Discussion building AMA teams that can work on difficult cases or support for difficult cases. Perhaps building a pyramidal structure so we know who we can go to if we need help. --CyclePat 06:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Just a clarifying question here: Do you mean something like a hierarchy? -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Discussion of the new AMABot by Martinp23 and how it is working with the AMA Alerts system.
 * Discussion of the new Advocates IRC Channel
 * Discussion of the new AMA Requests for Assistance system.
 * Something we probably don't want to address, but should we screen advocates?.
 * The case of MyWikiBiz.
 * Discussion of the response to the recent AMA Are you active template spamming by Martinp23 to most members, and what to do about those who repeatedly don't reply.
 * Discussion of a number of recent cases where advocates have been expected by advocees to "make their (incorrect) point of view be accepted" (with persistance after the advocate has offered advice) - discuss a potential rewording of parts of the request system to emphasize an advocates true role
 * Discussion Possibility of co-developing with WP:Esperanza some sort of a referral program to handle cases that only require minimal "helping hand" interventions.
 * Roll over from last meeting - A system of accountability - clarification and consensus required on the proposals brought up last time.
 * Discussion/Election of the need for a replacement deputy co-ordinator for Aeon1006, since his (temporary) resignation and wikibreak.
 * '''Creation of Election office- carry over
 * Discussion: What does the section of the FAQ regarding advocates appearing on multiple sides of a dispute mean and can we reprase the section to make its point more effectively?
 * Discussion of the role and actions of Wikiwoohoo as a Deputy Coordinator. Initiated by myself. Wikiwoohoo 19:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Discussion of the copyright status of the AMA logo, and possible alternatives (if required) (per Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates)
 * Officially greet and check up on new members since the end of last meeting:
 * "Chaz" -
 * He has apparently left wikipedia. See his talk page.
 * (who has returned)
 * He has apparently left wikipedia. See his talk page.
 * (who has returned)
 * He has apparently left wikipedia. See his talk page.
 * (who has returned)
 * He has apparently left wikipedia. See his talk page.
 * (who has returned)
 * He has apparently left wikipedia. See his talk page.
 * (who has returned)