Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/April 2007/Wimania

Case Filed On: 01:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Your problem:
I have been requested to seek assistance for the following Wikipedia users:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AntiCoelacan

e-mail: hardlyablev2responder@yahoo.com

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eblem

e-mail: martin_eble@yahoo.com

both of whom relate to me that they have been the victims of relentless persecution and blocking by:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Coelacan

including deletion of their posts, blocking of their talk pages, arbitrary conclusions as to their identity, disruption of their efforts to seek due process, all in collusion with the following:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PubliusFL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Luna_Santin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Newawlins

some of which - these users allege - appear to be the same person.

I know both the complaining users both personally and professionally and believe their complaints to be genuinely motivated. I would not otherwise agree to bring them to your attention.

I would appreciate it if my user ID could be kept out of this, as users who have encountered Coelacan appear to disappear from Wikipedia shortly thereafter.

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: NEW

Advocate Status:
 * None assigned.