Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/Mattisse 2

Case Filed On: 03:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:



Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:



Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
 * Answer: Yes

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)''' Now that the evidence of my alleged sockpuppets and those of others are being analysed in the Starwood Abritration, i see I was stupid to accept the posting as findings and not contest as I can see others are doing now. I see the indepth evidence that can be provided. My so-called sockpuppets occurred for some weeks and had hardly any overlapping articles. The sockpuppets he protected had dozens of overlapping and "interleavened edits" and has been going on since Spring of 2006. '''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.''' He has ignore my requests for explantions and those of others.   
 * Answer: Other: got me blocked for having sockpuppets without providing any evidence or following proper procedures.
 * Answer:

In addition, he supported the side of sockpuppets who were harassing me who have since been banned or suspended indefinitely: eg User:999 User:Ekajati and User:Hanuman Das What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
 * Answer: I want a true explanation of what actually happened and I want to know which, if any, are my sockpuppets.

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: closed

This case is already open at AMA_Requests_for_Assistance/Requests/November_2006/Mattisse. אמר Steve Caruso ( desk / AMA ) •  Give Back Our Membership!  22:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Advocate Status:
 * Cocoaguy ここがいい contribstalk 16:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)