Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/March 2007/CyclePat

Case Filed On: 01:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:



Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:


 * Category:Cities in the UTC timezone and relevant sub-categories.
 * Category:Geography by time

Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
 * Answer: YES! I'm an AMA member. I just need some help!

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''
 * Answer: Content dispute which may require some explanation before it escalates to personal attacks.

'''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''
 * Answer: none really! The article was brought to CfD and what more can we do right now!

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
 * Answer: Someone to look over the situation because I'm prety paranoid on how this entire process is going. Can you imagine! An AMA member paranoid! I would hate to see a Newbee.

Summary:
I find the category useful. They don't. They want to delete it. I want to use it and continue using it for useful things which I have enumarated in the CfD's (including the main and the Category:Cities in the UTC-5 timezone.

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: closed

Advocate Status:
 * --Neigel von Teighen 16:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)