Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/May 2007/andywo

Case Filed On: 06:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Your problem:
My problem is an article deletion based on faulty reasoning and a lack of careful attention to the debate.

To summarize: The entry was not OR, because it is based on four peer reviewed articles. Moreover, two published pieces (an article and a thesis) also cite the term, addressing its uses and limitations. It has been evaluated by editorial boards in two different discplines. What else is necessary to get a term listed in wikipedia?

I would be grateful if an objective and disinterested admin could review the debate here: [] and suggest options for an appropriate resolution.

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: NEW

Advocate Status:
 * None assigned.