Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll/Questions

Note: This list of suggestion questions is not complete.

Note
This is not a poll; these are some of the questions considered in the making of Attribution/Poll. All of them are questions somebody wanted to know the answer to; many of them were objected to as biased by somebody else. If they inspire your comments on the poll/discussion, they have at least served some purpose.

Do you support replacing Verifiability and No original research with a single policy?
== If there is a merge, are Attribution (and its FAQ proposed as a guideline) adequate replacements of Verifiability, No original research, and perhaps Reliable sources. ==

Do you support Wikipedia:Attribution?
[i.e., Do you believe it can be useful in some form?]

If the pages are merged should they include:
[Vote in the appropriate section, "yes" or "no".

Which of the following do you support?
 [You can vote any of the options, or vote 1st option, 2nd option and so forth] 

In the alternatives given below, the original pages means: those policy or guideline pages that, in accordance with consensus established in response to question 2, should be merged into Wikipedia:Attribution. WP:ATT is not everywhere verbally identical with its sources. Its supporters assert it makes no changes in policy, but is better phrased.

D. Wikipedia:Attribution becomes inactive. (Parts of it that reflect consensus are integrated into the original pages.)


== Attribution proposes that the current Verifiability and No original research policy with the Reliable sources guideline be merged into a single policy page. Do you: ==  [You can vote any of the options, or vote 1st option, 2nd option and so forth]