Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Addbot 17


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol oppose vote.svg Withdrawn by operator.

Addbot Task 17
Operator:  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e !

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): AWB

Function Overview: General fixes, Replaces tagging and what not (Expansion of previous AWB BRFA)

Edit period(s): Continuous

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: Doing small tasks on articles from DB dumps using AWB:
 * Removing Stub Tags on articles that are now larger than stubs
 * Adding and dating maintanence tags where needed (Already have a brfa for this just not from DB Dumps)
 * Applying other "General Fixes" Through AWB where appropriate (only when something else is being changed)
 * Re-ordering sections such as references categorys and notes where needed.
 * Unicodifying the article
 * Correcting capitalisation in section headings

Discussion

 * Just a couple of quick questions:
 * Will the bot simply be running through all articles, or only certain categories/sets where cleanup has been requested (not really important, more just curiosity)?
 * Will the bot wait if inuse is on a page before adding cleanup tags?  Richard 0612  13:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * One other question: what criteria do you use to decide whether to remove a stub tag? --R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The bot will be looking through selected cats, and lists from DB dumps. The "general cleanup / fixes" part will only save if something else is also being saved. If the page has an inuse template on it the bot will skip it. I think thats all you asked for :)  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 17:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Just curious, Isnt General fixes AWB Bot BFRAs denied earlier like this Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval/Archive_4, Bots/Requests for approval/Reedy Bot, Bots/Requests for approval/RefSpaceBot ?

Ofcourse, there have been instances of them being approved like Bots/Requests for approval/TaeBot, Bots/Requests for approval/Madhubot ! Some other questions?
 * Will "Skip if whitespace changes only" turned ON ?
 * Will it change "1990's" (etc.) to "1990s" (etc.) when General fixes turned on? Isnt this change have to manually checked ? There are definitely instances in which "1990's" is the correct spelling. For example: "1989's most successful athlete was Bo Diddly, while 1990's most successful athlete was Richard Nixon."
 * Will it fix spelling errors ? --  Tinu  Cherian  - 10:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The bot Will skip if only whitespace is changed, I will not fix spelling errors (due to the ammount of incorrect replaces it can make), The bot will still correct / try to correct dates as you pasted above.  ·Add§hore· ' T alk T o M e ! 17:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * General fixes such as the date fixing mentioned above require manual oversight and aren't really appropriate for an automated bot.  Richard 0612  20:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I would support this BRFA request, if AWB can make such changes (like date changes), which actually require manual oversight, optional. --  Tinu  Cherian  - 04:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I should be able to stop the date changes through a custom module in AWB.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 12:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This ? Then it shouldnot be a problem --  Tinu  Cherian  - 11:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes :) Well something very very similar.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 11:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * AFAIK, every bot request to do automated AWB general fixes on articles has been denied.


 * Removing Stub Tags on articles that are now larger than stubs
 * How does it define "larger than stubs"? bytecount? word count?


 * Adding and dating maintanence tags where needed (Already have a brfa for this just not from DB Dumps)
 * Which maintenance tags will it add and using what criteria?


 * Applying other "General Fixes" Through AWB where appropriate (only when something else is being changed)
 * These are generally not appropriate for an unsupervised bot.


 * Correcting capitalisation in section headings
 * This is on the same level as spelling fixes, not really appropriate for a bot, unless it can tell whether a word is a proper noun or not.
 * Also, the most recent DB dump is 4 months old, I presume it will detect if changes need to be made by looking at the DB dump, but getting the current version to actually make the changes on? Mr.Z-man 20:16, 21 February 2009 (UTC)


 *  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 08:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.