Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Albambot 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

Albambot
Operator: Albamhandae (talk) (ko:User:알밤한대)

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic supervised (-autonomous mode)

Programming Language(s): Pywikipedia via SVN, Python

Function Summary: This bot is interwiki bot

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): daily

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y: ar, ca, cs, de, es, it, ko, nl, no, pt, ro, ru, simple, sl, sv, tr, vo (full list)

Function Details: Adding, Modifying interwiki. (This bot has blocked now.)

Discussion
How often do you update your interwiki.py? Do you have a bot flag elsewhere? -- maelgwn - talk 13:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I have been updating interwiki.py for once a week. Other Wikipedia on bot flag as above. (Albambot's contributions in de wikipedia)--Albamhandae (talk) 21:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 14:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I have unblocked the bot for 25 edits only. Do NOT make more than 25 edits. We need to discuss issues related to this, Bots/Requests for approval/Albambot and Bots/Requests for approval/Albambot (2nd request). Gimmetrow 21:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * complete 25 edits --Albamhandae (talk) 22:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Using an established framework, Albambot has 6000 edits spread over 36 wikis, with at least 100 edits on 17 wikis. Albambot does not have bot status on fr (400 edits, denied), fi (250 edits), or ja (475 edits, denied). On bg (175 edits), appears it will be approved aware of the first failure here. Was approved on es (550 edits) by a 10-3 vote. Can find no indication of the approval on de (800 edits). Albamhandae, however, has only made a little over 200 edits on all wikis. About half of those are on en, mostly related to bot requests and adding interwikis by hand. I would feel more comfortable if Albamhandae had more edits somewhere. Gimmetrow 04:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I share your concerns as to the owner's suitability (and those "BRFAs" in different languages are somewhat concerning), but did you find any errors in the edits made during the trial? dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 04:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It's pywikipedia. We don't automatically approve every bot running pywikipedia; the operator is considered too. However, it looks like he may have nearly 5000 edits on another account on ko. (That account has edited this BRFA.) Gimmetrow 04:21, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, I agree we consider the botop. We should do that for every BRFA. I was just curious if anything specific had come up in this trial, or if the concerns were more general (but equally valid). dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 04:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * If there were any errors in a pywiki interwiki, the issue would be quickly fixed by the pywiki developers. Anyone else have objections? Gimmetrow 09:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * None from me. SQL Query me!  07:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹoɟʇs (st47) 22:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.