Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AnomieBOT 35


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

AnomieBOT 35
Operator: Anomie⚔

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic, unsupervised

Programming language(s): Perl

Source code available: User:AnomieBOT/source/tasks/PageMover.pm

Function overview: Move single-day articles (e.g. December 1, 2003) in Category:Days in 2003 and Category:Days in 2005 to the corresponding Portal:Current events subpage (e.g. Portal:Current events/2003 December 1).

Edit period(s): One-time

Estimated number of pages affected: 294

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function details: Per request, move single-day articles (e.g. December 1, 2003) in Category:Days in 2003 and Category:Days in 2005 to the corresponding Portal:Current events subpage (e.g. Portal:Current events/2003 December 1). This is simply a cleanup, as new day pages have been created as subpages of the portal for a few years now. Redirects will be left from the old names.

Discussion
I'm not really sure what to say here in the discussion, but THANK YOU VERY MUCH, Anomie!! Reywas92 Talk 16:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The bot appears to be cleaning up details for decisions already made in the community about how to handle single day page moves, so there's not much to say. Bot operator communicates well with the community and codes well. No concerns, imo. --69.225.3.198 (talk) 20:56, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Go on then. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 11:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Anomie⚔ 04:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Just looking at the some of the more "modern" ones, they use e.g. . Is this something the bot should add? - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 17:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you mean. Yesterday was Portal:Current events/2009 November 8. Reywas92 Talk  17:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * So that includes the line and ends with |}, but the ones Anomie has transferred are missing that line at source. Is this OK? - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 17:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see. That's perfectly fine if these don't have that. It just adds the header and border, which is already too inconsistent for the earlier years and would change the month page more than necessary. Reywas92 Talk  20:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

BAGAssistanceNeeded Anomie⚔ 03:10, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅  MBisanz  talk 07:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.