Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BU RoBOT 29


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved

BU RoBOT 29
Operator:

Time filed: 14:11, Tuesday, November 8, 2016 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Tag articles for the following projects as identified by a consensus of project members: WikiProject College baseball, WikiProject Softball/College softball task force, WikiProject Ice Hockey/College Ice Hockey task force (essentially, most college sports projects that I'm not already approved for)

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
 * Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_College_baseball
 * Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Softball/College_softball_task_force
 * Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey/College_Ice_Hockey_task_force

Edit period(s): Multiple one-time runs as demanded by the projects

Estimated number of pages affected: 2,000, but it's hard to say beyond that because the projects are still figuring out exactly what they want tagged. It's likely the list of categories to be tagged will expand after the first round is complete.

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Functions identically to Bots/Requests for approval/BU RoBOT 17, Bots/Requests for approval/BU RoBOT 18, Bots/Requests for approval/BU RoBOT 27, and Bots/Requests for approval/BU RoBOT 28. Tags the talk pages of articles within categories identified by the WikiProject as falling entirely under their scope. Auto-assessment is included, as is the auto parameter to allow editors to track which articles were automatically assessed.

Discussion

 * (50 for each project). — xaosflux  Talk 15:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Two things:
 * I removed college football from the above list. Forgot I already had approval there (27). Whoops!
 * Any particular breakdown you'd like to see? I'll do 70/70/60 if you have no preference. ~ Rob 13 Talk 15:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 50/50/50 is fine. — xaosflux  Talk 23:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. I'll get to this later tonight. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Contribs. I over-estimated the number of affected pages here. The revised estimate is 2,000 for this first run of all three projects, but keep in mind that future runs will likely push it above that. ~ Rob 13 Talk 04:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Task approved. — xaosflux  Talk 04:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.