Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BetacommandBot 2

Note: This request is no longer approved. To regain approval for this task, a new request for approval must be filed. — M ETS 501 (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

BetacommandBot
Operator: Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot)

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s):AWB

Function Summary:Creating Category pages

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):daily

Edit rate requested: 8 edits per minute

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):Yes

Function Details: I want to have my bot create category pages for cats that are populated by a template but the cat page was not created. I will stick "This page is populated by a template" as the created page.

Discussion
I think I basically follow this, although I'm just wondering if there is a more useful message other than a simple sentence. In any case, can you provide a diff for our review. -- RM 15:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The message could use improvement and sugestions are welcome, I was unsure of the wording I should use     are some diffs. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for those difs, I don't really care for the wording though, could it be updated to something like: Some pages in this category have been added from ? PRE-TEST approved, up to 50 edits, for development work. —  xaosflux  Talk 23:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * A quick note, the cats that will be created will be populated solely from templates, Im cleaning up Special:categories and the ones that I detect I know is populated by a template but not necciarly what template is populating it. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I know I don't like the wording, but I don't really have any better suggestion. I suppose I have no other objections.  If someone comes to you and suggests a better phrase/content, please use it.  Otherwise, what else is there to say? -- RM 03:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Approved. It's finally time to approve this, discussion being dead. Please follow Xaosflux's recommendation to say something like "Some pages in this category have been added from ". -- RM 03:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.