Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Bot11598


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Bot11598
Operator:

Time filed: 05:47, Friday, November 17, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): Autowikibrowser

Source code available: WP:AWB

Function overview: to append to the end of pages that transclude.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): one time run

Estimated number of pages affected: 494 - 750

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No

Function details: The bot will append to the end of pages that transclude. The template used was recently vandalized. The effected pages need to be purged. OTRS is receiving an influx of tickets about the matter.

Discussion

 * The bot will also need the AWB flag. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:48, 17 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: Wouldn't null edits be less intrusive? Also, What Links Here says that there are 1065 transclusions of this template in all namespaces. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The request I have made is in accordance to the suggestion listed at Purge --Cameron11598 (Talk) 15:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: I do not see any recent changes in the history of this template. Can you please link to the template in question? – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:07, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * see this template. Checking in AWB shows 495 transclusions. However the template transclusion tool shows ~750 transclusions. I've amended the BRFA accordingly.   --Cameron11598 (Talk) 15:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm only looking to do article space so the 494 is correct. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 15:48, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. All 745 pages with transclusions have been null-edited. Please let me know if you see any problems. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * --Cameron11598 (Talk) 19:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.