Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Captainraju1Bot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol delete vote.svg Denied

Captainraju1Bot
Operator:

Time filed: 15:55, Thursday, October 6, 2016 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser

Source code available: github, Standard pywikipedia, AWB

Function overview: Add DEFAULTSORT to people stubs, where there is an unambiguous sort key given to existing categories,fixing.This will help the stub categories be sorted in the correct order. It's also a good idea anyway to be added while an article is young.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): daily

Edit rate requested: 500 edits per hour

Estimated number of pages affected: 500

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No

Function details: As above. Very simple

Discussion
Standard AWB functionality, applied in a targeted manner. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 10:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * a few questions: Is there a reason you need to specifically override exclusion compliance? Can you point to a MOS or prior discussion regarding this task? —  xaosflux  Talk 18:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * What is the estimated number of pages your run will cover (for existing pages) ? — xaosflux  Talk 04:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I added estimated number of pages affected 300 more. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 23:53, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Only 300, but you are expressing your edit rate as 500eph? So you expect to only edit for 36 mins and be done? —  xaosflux  Talk 00:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Why do you need to override exclusions? — xaosflux  Talk 00:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * — xaosflux  Talk 16:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * First time,I'm sorry for not responding my bot request page.I've changed my estimated number.Now I have added Estimated number of pages affected 500. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 21:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Any answers to the other questions? — xaosflux  Talk 22:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * No, I do not have to answer any other questions I would like to approved my bot page. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 23:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Operator will not participate in discussion about why they need to override exclusion compliance. — xaosflux  Talk 04:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.