Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

Chris G Bot
Operator: Chris G

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic with Supervision

Programming Language(s): Perl using PerlWikipedia

Function Summary: The bot updates Australian Wikipedians' notice board/AfD with the content in WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily

Edit rate requested: X edits per TIME 1-3 edits a day

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: See Here

Discussion

 * Chris G, could you post to this page, please, to confirm that you are indeed this bot's operator? — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 02:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Yup I'm the bot op also take a look here. -- C h r i s   g 03:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Cool; thanks. Otherwise, the routine looks good; I'd like to see the source code, but a trial will do. — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 03:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok I've Completed the source code can I have a trial run? -- C h r i s   g 11:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and trial for up to a week, let us know how it goes here. —  xaosflux  Talk 05:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * To use the proper template, Any news? Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 08:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I misread the date. Any more bugs, or can I approve this? D Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 08:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I got all the bugs out so you can approve. -- C h r i s   g 10:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Are you sure? You had to fix the last bot edit. ~   Wi ki  her mit  17:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

The trial was for seven days, and I think you should continue it. It looks like you had a very rocky development process, and as you had to fix the bot's last edit, I don't know that the bugs are out. , for seven days more. The burden of proof is on you to prove that the bot is harmless and useful. — madman bum and angel 17:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * (Sorry if I'm not meant to post here) Would it be possible to include a wikilink in the bot's edit summary? I'd find that convenient.  Thanks either way,  Giggy  Talk 01:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree. -- Boricua  e  ddie  01:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * D Do you have any more remaining bugs (that you know of), or is this ready to approve? Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 22:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * All done! You may now aprove -- Chris G talk  10:33, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 23:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.