Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ChuispastonBot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

ChuispastonBot
Operator:

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic.

Programming language(s): pywikipedia

Source code available: Standard pywikipedia

Function overview: interwiki + cosmetic changes

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): daily (in this period). I am thinking about make it continous.

Estimated number of pages affected: depending on interwiki needs. For the previous runs on french wikipedia, it has been from none to twenty per day. The parameters are the defect ones.

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): no.

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): yes. This bot has a bot flag on french wikipedia (check it).

Function details: Classical pywikipedia interwiki and cosmetic changes functions. The used command is (mainly) : interwiki.py -autonomous - continue

Discussion
What are the cosmetic changes? General fixes? — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 15:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, as provided by the english dictionnary of the cosmetic_changes.py module. Grimlock (talk) 15:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Have you read WP:BOTPOL, particularly WP:BOTPOL and WP:BOTPOL? Also, please consider registering User:Chuispaston as a doppelgänger account of User:Grimlock so the bot name can be said to identify you. Anomie⚔ 16:19, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. I have read the policies and I can restrict the cosmetic_changes.py use on en. I am quite surprised by your suggestion to create a doppelgänger account as my principal account is identified on the bot page, but if you think it's better, I will create it immediatly. Grimlock (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ the doppleganger account is created. Grimlock (talk) 16:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Will the bot be staying out of the template namespace, as required by our policy on interwiki linking bots? From the command you said you'd use, it looks like it would be going inside the Template namespace which is not allowed here, you'll probably have to add  to restrict it to articles and categories (or something like that, depending on what namespaces you want to work on, see Namespace for a list of namespace IDs). - EdoDodo  talk 05:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * As the policy requires, my bot will be restricted to main and category spaces. Grimlock (talk) 07:48, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to take the time you need for the trial, it may take a while to find pages needing changes, since a lot of our pages already have interwikis. Don't worry too much about going over a bit, Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. - EdoDodo  talk 06:03, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * thanks, let's go for it. Grimlock (talk) 09:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * These contributions were a mix between a full research (interwiki.py -lang:en -autonomous -start:D -async -namespace:0 -namespace:14 or interwiki.py -lang:en -autonomous -continue -async -namespace:0 -namespace:14) and from time to time a research on newpages (interwiki.py -lang:en -autonomous -nepwages -namespace:0 -namespace:14) Grimlock (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * These contributions were a mix between a full research (interwiki.py -lang:en -autonomous -start:D -async -namespace:0 -namespace:14 or interwiki.py -lang:en -autonomous -continue -async -namespace:0 -namespace:14) and from time to time a research on newpages (interwiki.py -lang:en -autonomous -nepwages -namespace:0 -namespace:14) Grimlock (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

BAG assistance needed
 * Edits look okay, sorry for the delay. - EdoDodo  talk 17:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.