Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot II 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

ClueBot II 3
Operator: -- Cobi(t

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, unsupervised

Programming Language(s): PHP, wikibot.classes.php.

Function Summary: Create asteroid stubs.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One long run.

Edit rate requested:

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: Create asteroid stubs per User:Naerii. See Special:Contributions/Cobi for examples of what it will create (I ran the script in manual mode where I approved each edit).

Discussion

 * What about notability of these rocks? Max S em(Han shot first!) 06:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If they are not notable, then Naerii shouldn't be asking editors to create those stubs, and should be advised against it. I'll ask on a related WikiProject about notability.  -- Cobi(t 07:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Any progress, or, reason one way or another, on why or why not these rocks are notable? My gut feeling is yes, but, I haven't had the chance to look into it yet. I'll try to here in a moment. SQL Query me!  03:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I was considering doing this myself. If notability is satisfied, I don't see much of a problem. SQL Query me!  11:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright, well, let's see a trial. Could you create say.... 10 such articles in your userspace cobi? SQL Query me! 02:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ - See here. -- Cobi(t 06:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Looks great to me, and, as it's not really controversial,  SQL Query me!  06:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.