Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/EnterpriseyBot 10


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved

EnterpriseyBot 10
Operator:

Time filed: 02:37, Sunday, January 22, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: supervised

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: https://github.com/APerson241/EnterpriseyBot/blob/master/redirect-banners/bot.py

Function overview: Comments out the importance class parameter in WikiProject banners on the talk pages of redirects

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): WP:BOTREQ

Edit period(s): Weekly

Estimated number of pages affected: ~500?

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: If a page has been a redirect for a week, the bot comments out the importance class parameter in each of the WikiProject banners in the redirect's associated talk page.

Discussion
The linked discussion had at least one vocal opposition to doing this, pinging for comment. — xaosflux  Talk 02:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm only opposed to removing the importance parameter. No opposition to the majority of the task discussed at bot requests., this task doesn't seem to be what you discussed at bot requests. Did you mean to say commenting out the class parameter? That seems to be both the more urgent and less controversial task. ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * . Fixed. Enterprisey (talk!) 02:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No objection to the corrected task. ~ Rob 13 Talk 04:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Agreed with Rob here. There is little point classing a redirect with the class parameter. TheMagikCow (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear, are you objecting to the task or saying it's ok? The task removes an inaccurate class (stub, start, etc.) from redirects. ~ Rob 13 Talk 08:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Fully supporting this task. Sorry for the ambiguity! TheMagikCow (talk) 12:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)


 * — xaosflux  Talk 05:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * - edits here. Enterprisey (talk!) 21:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Task approved. I see there were 2 errors, but you caught them so I'm assuming you fixed the bugs along the way. —  xaosflux  Talk 05:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.