Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ErfgoedBot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

ErfgoedBot
Operator:

Time filed: 08:52, Tuesday, May 12, 2020 (UTC)

Function overview: Reports published in non-article space

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/diffusion/THER/browse/master/erfgoedbot/

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Daily

Estimated number of pages affected: ~30 pages

Namespace(s): Wikipedia, User

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No):

Function details: commons:Commons:Monuments database/Missing commonscat links, commons:Commons:Monuments database/Images without id, commons:Commons:Monuments database/Unused images

Discussion
As a note, this bot has been editing (without any obvious complaints or issues) in the WP-space since about 2012. I'll leave this open for ~24 hours for comments from other BAG, but if no one objects in that time period I will accept the bot. Primefac (talk) 15:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Since this bot was blocked, many images categorized in the WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Images without refnum have wound up on that page out of alphabetical order. Additionally, there are images that have already been tagged with NRHP reference number tags that ended up on the list. This has been a problem before, but the scale of incorrectly tagged images has increased since then. -User:DanTD (talk) 04:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Is there an ETA as to when the bot will return? Einbierbitte (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the delay, I kinda forgot about this. Primefac (talk) 14:04, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.