Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FastilyBot 13


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

FastilyBot 13
Operator:

Time filed: 08:07, Sunday, August 13, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Java

Source code available:

Function overview: Post various reports at Database reports instead of the bot's userspace.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Daily

Estimated number of pages affected: Few

Namespace(s):Project

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): n/a

Function details: see function overview

Discussion
As long as the reports are not duplicates of existing ones, I personally have no objection. However, I would suggest that a discussion is needed, probably on the database reports talk page, to establish consensus for those reports to go there. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 11:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * What he said. Does this task have consensus?— CYBERPOWER  ( Chat ) 12:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Posted a notification on the DBR talk page. Regards,  F ASTILY   17:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

This sounds fine to me. Any and all help maintaining the database reports is welcome. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Any update on this?— CYBERPOWER  ( Chat ) 08:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * It's been about a week with no objections. Given that this is a non-controversial task restricted to the subpages of DBR, could this be approved or given a trial?  Thanks,   F ASTILY   00:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * — CYBERPOWER  (Around ) 06:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Cyberpower678. I'm working on updating my code.  I should have the trial started by tomorrow.  Regards,   F ASTILY   01:07, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

See history of Database reports/Recently Untagged Files for Dated Deletion. - F ASTILY   03:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * — CYBERPOWER  ( Chat ) 07:42, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.