Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Hazard-Bot 13


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol neutral vote.svg Request Expired.

Hazard-Bot (13)
Operator:

Time filed: 03:06, Tuesday June 5, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual:

Programming language(s): Python / C#

Source code available: PyWikipedia / AutoWikiBrowser

Function overview: Substituting templates per Templates for discussion/Holding cell

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Occasional

Estimated number of pages affected: N/A

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: The bot will substitute templates after TFD consensus and when listed at Templates for discussion/Holding cell.  Hazard-SJ  ✈   03:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Discussion
Has there been any discussion on Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion (or else where), to let those involved in the process know about this bot? -- Chris 09:04, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I just created Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion.  Hazard-SJ  ✈   21:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * FYI, SporkBot has been approved for this task. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 18:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Since both bots are manually started, I don't think this will be a major issue.  Hazard-SJ  ✈   00:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * As for BAG, I'll generate the list of pages with AWB, then substitute with PWB.  Hazard-SJ  ✈   00:52, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Unless the list is generated manually by the bot operator, care must be taken to ensure that vandals don't abuse this to substitute templates out of process. Note, for example, that Categories for discussion/Working is fully protected for this reason. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:35, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'll be checking before I start any substitutions.  Hazard-SJ  ✈   03:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * – This is a simple enough task, and if there's not enough demand for it within seven days to review the results of a trial, I'm not convinced that we need more active bots doing it. &mdash; madman 14:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I still have nothing to do (as yet?).  Hazard-SJ  ✈   21:16, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Any updates? —  The   Earwig   (talk) 20:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * – No response from operator, and it appears that there is indeed not enough demand for this task for a redundant approval. &mdash; madman 04:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.