Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JetBot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol oppose vote.svg Withdrawn by operator.

JetBot
Operator: Jet123

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, but supervised

Programming Language(s): AWB & Python

Function Summary: Anything, like cleaning vandalism, but supervised

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Continuous

Edit rate requested: 10 edits per minute

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):

Function Details: The bot can do anything to aid Wikipedia and cleanup vandalism.

Discussion

 * Do you have any tasks a bit more specific to propose? Gimmetrow 02:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * JetBot's task is to cleanup vandalism. Jet123 02:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Vandalism can't be cleaned up using AWB, as it doesn't have such a function. Are you going to be manually reverting the vandalism under this bot account? Mart inp23  14:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm inclinded towards denying this bot. Will give the operator a day or two to refactor if desired.
 * AWB and python? Are you going to use this bot for two seperate scripts, if so are they related?  What will it be doing in AWB?
 * This bot should have a userpage describing its function and the operators contact information.
 * This function is too vauge, needs clarification. If this is just a request to use AWB as an editor, it doesn't need to go through here.
 * —  xaosflux  Talk 01:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I fully agree with Xaosflux, this request is really too vague, and as proved in the past, vague request bring only problems. The user isn't that experienced here, so I feel more sure if one of our BAG check the source to see that it's all right.  Snowolf (talk) CON COI  -  05:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Operator didn't wanted to run a bot. Jet123 (Talk) 04:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.