Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/John of Reading Bot 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

John of Reading Bot 3
Operator:

Time filed: 16:44, Saturday, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser

Source code available: No; using AWB "Prepend"

Function overview: Add CFD notices to 2000 categories

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: 2000

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Use AWB "Prepend" to add a CFD notice to 2000 categories. This is too many to do manually. The downside of doing it from a bot account is that someone might be watching the categories but have "Hide bot edits" ticked, and miss the notification. Still, this will get the job done.

Discussion

 * Support. I've had to do this a few times for WP:TFD and it ticks all the deletion criteria but makes it a lot easier to do. Primefac (talk) 16:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I see you are the creator of many of these - the real question is: Is this actually really needed? Will the CfD actually not be discussed and processed if these thousands of tags are skipped? —  xaosflux  Talk 01:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Personally I am not concerned but what might be a more useful exercise would be to leave a talk page notice on creators of the more recent years and some of the later subcategories eg . I did not create any of those and they appear to have a diverse number of creators. Also see User:KConWiki/Events by month which has a list of the categories after 1800 mostly created by others. Tim! (talk) 10:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't do a lot of CfD maintenance, but isn't the standard practice to notify the creators as well? Is there a very large number of creators? —  xaosflux  Talk 14:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is, though User:Marcocapelle didn't ask for help with that. I've just spot-checked about 50 of the histories in the list to be tagged; most of those were created by User:Tim!, a few by User:IgnorantArmies (now blocked), and a few by User:J 1982. I don't have an easy way to check the 2000 categories systematically to find any other creators. -- John of Reading (talk) 14:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)


 * , : While there are no technical issues with this request it does not appear to be necessary. I placed an administrator note on Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_May_26 waiving the individual tagging requirement.  Notices to related parent categories and a WikiProject were sent in lieu. —  xaosflux  Talk 15:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks! Marcocapelle (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.