Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Legobot 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

Legobot 3
Operator: LegoKontribsTalkM

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic Supervised

Programming Language(s): AutoWikiBrowser

Function Summary: Help with CFD and UCFD

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Whenever needed

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: Based on category renames, the bot will change to the new category. I have already been running this through my account, and it will be helpful with a bot flag. LegoKontribsTalkM 21:18, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Discussion
So let me make sure I understand. You're already running this task (supervised) with AWB, using your main account. You're just looking for approval to run this task under your bot account, which already has a bot flag. And you're requesting permission to run it "supervised", the same way you do with your main account. Is that right? – Quadell (talk) 14:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, In my main account, I have to click save every time, but with a bot account, I can just watch the screen and not have to click the save button everytime. LegoKontribsTalkM 18:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Just be sure to watch over it. It's your responsibility to revert if the bot starts acting up. – Quadell (talk) 17:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 33 edits LegoKontribsTalkM 20:41, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Edits like this one seem to be changing to a (currently) non-existent category. Is this supposed to happen? – Quadell (talk) 13:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * OperatorAssistanceNeeded SQL Query me!  06:15, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That edit was human errror, I must have typed it in wrong. I will be more careful next time. LegoKontribsTalkM 17:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

BJ Talk 12:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.