Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Legobot 8


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

Legobot 8
Operator: LegoKontribsTalkM

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic Unsupervised

Programming Language(s): Python

Function Summary: Creating watchlist for CFL

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Weekly

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details:

Goes through Category:Canadian football and subcats, and makes a list of all articles in it to be used as a "watchlist" through RelatedChanges.

Lists them at WikiProject Canadian football/Articles.

Discussion
I'm just curious if you'd open this to other projects, or just keep it with the Canadian Football Project? §hep  •   ¡Talk to me!  21:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I can do this for other projects too. LegoKontribsTalkM 01:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That's cool. This should be really useful.  §hep   •   ¡Talk to me!  01:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * LegoKontribsTalkM 01:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * . I realize that this trial would cover the entire task, but we'll count it as trial; assuming successful and you want it, the trial can prove the bot for use with other future lists.  You may want to consider making a text based list so project members can copy and paste it to their raw watchlists. —  xaosflux  Talk 12:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I have started the trial. I can create a page like /raw for the raw watchlist.  LegoKontribsTalkM 04:57, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * OperatorAssistanceNeeded Any progress?  Richard 0612  17:02, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I am cleaning up the code, and adding a feature so it will display the name of the category of the article per request. LegoKontribsTalkM 02:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * LegoKontribsTalkM 22:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * In general, everything looks fine, although I'm unsure about this edit where the raw watchlist was cleared. Was that a bug?  Richard 0612  19:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes and it has been fixed. LegoKontribsTalkM 02:26, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * In that case,  Richard  0612  10:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.