Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MartinBotIII 5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

MartinBotIII
Operator: Martinp23

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): AWB (perhaps branching out to pywiki later)

Function Summary: Replace instances of uses of images where, for example, and image is deleted on commons, or is found to be a redirect.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Irregularly spaced runs

Edit rate requested: 10-15 epm (unlikely to get this high though)

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):Y

Function Details: Image find/replacement after adminsitrative actions, or based on community consensus. Also, where a very popular image is deleted, the bot may be used to remove the existing redlinks, again on request only.

Discussion
for 50 edits, but make sure that you don't start an image and not finish it. ST47 Talk 12:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Trial complete, replacing Image:Crystal 128 ksmiletris.png with Image:Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png, after a rename/duplication. The job was over 2000 pages, and I've done 56 edits, using AWB's image replacement system.  The AWB system tends to be very reliable, and is able to take images out of galleries as well as any other use (NPWatcher uses the same algorithm).  If you would like me to do another trial on a specific image to show this ability, please say so, but I'm not sure if there is such a task waiting at the moment... Martinp23 13:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Great, if you can, go ahead. ST47 Talk 14:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I manufactured a test situation on a couple of pages - here is the bot renaming the non existant image to the correct one: normal usage and gallery usage. Martinp23 15:02, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, good. ST47 Talk 15:23, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.