Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MetricSupporter89Bot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

MetricSupporter89Bot
Operator:

Time filed: 00:10, Friday, March 22, 2019 (UTC)

Function overview: This is a proposed bot to be operated by MetricSupporter89.

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual:

Programming language(s):

Source code available:

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s):

Estimated number of pages affected:

Namespace(s):

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No):

Adminbot (Yes/No):

Function details:

This is a proposed bot to be operated by MetricSupporter89.

Discussion

 * this request is empty, please complete it straight away or it will be closed (you an always open a new request later). — xaosflux  Talk 01:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I was the one who "created" this BRFA, converting it from just "This is a proposed bot to be operated by MetricSupporter89." to the proper format (Special:Diff/888886905). --DannyS712 (talk) 01:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

This bot is going to be managed by me. The bot will contribute stub articles that may be too hard to contribute by human users, edit my user page to be like other users’ pages, revert vandalism, etc. Metric Supporter 89 (talk) 01:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * ^^^ --DannyS712 (talk) 01:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)


 * This is a really bad idea. MetricSupport89 is under editing restrictions for disruptive conduct on units of measure and English language variants with this response . Their grasp of Wikipedia policy and editing procedures is suboptimal for regular editing, much less for operating a bot of the scope that is proposed. I've blocked the MetricSupport89Bot username - in the very unlikely event that a bot is approved it can be unblocked.   Acroterion   (talk)   02:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)


 * the scope of this bot is both poorly defined, and overly broad. Additionally, the operator is not sufficiently experienced here to run such tasks, even if they were better defined. —  xaosflux  Talk 02:08, 22 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.