Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MizBot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol neutral vote.svg Request Expired.

MizBot
Operator:

Time filed: 17:35, Thursday December 19 2013 (UTC)

Automatic or Manual: Manuel

Programming language(s): Python (pywikipdia bot)

Source code available: No

Function overview: No

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Reverts Vandelsim

Edit period(s): Continueous

Estimated number of pages affected: it depend on the articles that they vandalize

Exclusion compliant (Y/N):

Already has a bot flag ''No):

Function details: This bot is made to revert vandelsim, test edits, blanking pages and content replacement, it leaves a message ln the user or ip talk page

Discussion
Why can you not just manually revert vandalism with your main account? Anomie⚔ 20:33, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

These are my thoughts exactly. A manual vandalism and all the other mentioned problem edits is pretty much just human editing. Unless this bot is offering advanced assistance, like ClueBot or Huggle, I doubt this even counts as a bot or script. I also have concerns about operator's competence as seen by poor filling in this form and almost non-existent function details. This hasn't even been transcluded on the main page. We would need way more detail before any further action is taken. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 20:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Never transcluded. - Jarry1250 [Vacation needed] 21:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.