Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Monkbot 15


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Monkbot 15
Operator:

Time filed: 14:56, Wednesday, November 20, 2019 (UTC)

Function overview: replaces the various templates (and their redirects) with

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): awb c#

Source code available: yes

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):, (this discussion is collapsed)

Edit period(s): one time run

Estimated number of pages affected: 290k-ish (the number of pages using )

Namespace(s): anywhere is used

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): yes

Function details: details at bot description page

Discussion
At Special:Contributions/Monkbot, there are 50 manual edits that illustrate the bot's operation (all are labeled 'Task 15 (developmental testing): ...')

—Trappist the monk (talk) 17:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Took an eye to the source code and it seems like no "false positive" templates slipped in although I think that May icon can simply be deleted as it's not currently used anywhere. I'd recommend that the new template be titled "in language" rather than "in lang" for clarity but I think that TFD settled on the latter. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Tweaked to delete if found.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

BAGAssistanceNeeded —Trappist the monk (talk) 13:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Primefac (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Nothing unexpected. Fifty 8 December 2019 edits at Special:Contributions/Monkbot.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 22:08, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Looks good to me. . As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. -- The SandDoctor Talk 10:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.