Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/NeuRobot 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol oppose vote.svg Withdrawn by operator.

NeuRobot 3
Operator: &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review)

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): AWB

Function Overview: Tagging non-free SVG logos with SVG-logo

Edit period(s): Daily(ish)

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: Please see Bots/Requests for approval/MifterBot I -- I am picking up this job for a bot which is no longer running. The task was ✅ for that bot.

Discussion
I'm glad to see someone removed the misleading crap from that template. Hopefully it stays off.

I see Mifter is still active, have you asked whether the MifterBot is actually no longer performing the task? Anomie⚔ 02:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That's a good point, don't know why I didn't do that first. Done. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 12:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey there, yes I am still running the bot ;), I have not run it for a while because of the large amount of time and resources it takes to generate the new lists and the long time delay is to allow for a larger amount of .svg images to be uploaded as to conserve resources. I was actually planning on running the bot again this weekend being that I haven't run this bot in a while and their should be a bunch of new images ready to tag :).  All the Best,  Mifter (talk) 02:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, I had been having some problems with AWB which have sense been fixed which had also been hampering my ability to run my bot ;). All the Best, Mifter (talk) 02:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Is there any harm in getting two bots to do this? &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 11:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no need, it's not that huge of a task. Anomie⚔ 13:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Will reapply in a month or so if MifterBot doesn't continue doing it. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 01:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.