Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PavloChemBot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol delete vote.svg Denied

PavloChemBot
Operator:

Time filed: 16:18, Monday, March 23, 2015 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised, Manual

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: Standard pywikipedia

Function overview: bot will be used mainly for making replacements, other standard pywikipedia features are not yet planned to be used.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): one time run

Estimated number of pages affected: ca. 90.

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes (in Ukrainian Wikipedia).

Function details: I intend to move articles about Max Planck Institutes to the Category:Max Planck Institutes as it is done, for instance, in German Wikipedia. Now those articles belong to the parent Category:Max Planck Society, which is much more than only institutes. Maybe in future other similar simple replacement tasks. I'll ask first for consensus for more complicated tasks, if any.

Discussion
where is the discussion pages for this action? If you link it to me I can finish the moves. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:52, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your offer. There is no discussion page for it, but it is pretty obvious move as it is hard to find anything in the Category:Max Planck Society that is not one of Max Planck Institutes. Compare for instance with German de:Kategorie:Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. It is just more convenient for me to accomplish such tasks with my own bot. --Pavlo Chemist (talk) 22:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Is the entire scope of what you want this bot will ever do is to change category tags on <100 articles? — xaosflux  Talk 23:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Of course not, I could have done it in manual mode. As I have written above "Maybe in future other similar simple replacement tasks. I'll ask first for consensus for more complicated tasks, if any." For instance, the bot is used in Ukrainian Wikipedia for various replacements not just initiated by myself, but also asked by community, which is very convenient. --Pavlo Chemist (talk) 09:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

I am afraid we can't approve a bot like that here. You can get a bot approval if you propose specific task that should be done by bot and for every new task you 'll have to get a new approval. The current ask can be done manually. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:53, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * With a bot-status I could have done useful work requested in Bot requests — I guess having one additional bot for faster response would be beneficial. Sure, the current task can be done manually, but why litter other people's watchlists? That's up to you, anyway. I can do it either way, the difference is only whether other users have an option to hide bot(-like) edits in their watchlists or not. --Pavlo Chemist (talk) 08:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I am sorry but I can't do that. When one of Bot requests comes and you can do it, leave a message that you can do it and then you 'll get approval to perform that particular task. This is the tactic we followed so far to keep the bot tasks clear. I can give you more generic approval again based on bot requests. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Please these 90-100 pages manually. Revisit when you are ready based on the discussion we had in your talk page. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 09:39, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.