Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Reedy Bot 1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

Reedy Bot
Operator: Reedy Boy

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Tagging is Automatic, Manual Selection of Pages

Programming Language(s): AutoWikiBrowser with User:Kingboyk's plugin

Function Summary: Tagging Talk Pages under the influence of various WikiProjects.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): As and When - Not every day, but when it is being done, for a few hours in that day

Edit rate requested: 6 per Minute (max)

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: As Above. Helping out with talk page tagging using AWB and kingbotk's Plugin.

Samples of Edits are available on this account Special:Contributions/Reedy_Boy.

Will work on categories by request, or categories of articles that are not tagged, but covered by a certain wikiproject.

Discussion
I am an Active AWB developer and also help User:kingboyk out on the development of his plugin. Reedy Boy 21:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Will you be assessing the articles, or just placing the template? — M ETS 501 (talk) 21:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I was planning on just placing the base template, with cat and importance tags. Hence requesting bot status for automatic saving of the edits. Reedy Boy 21:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Make 50-100 edits and make sure there's no problems, the report back. — M ETS 501 (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. =) Reedy Boy 22:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, thats 100 new Talk pages tagged, and around 67 with their tag changed. Reedy Boy 00:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

This bot shall run with a flag. — M ETS 501 (talk) 01:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Just linking to the first proposal for Reedy Bot and noting that it was withdrawn and not approved. Only to avoid chance for confustion. - Taxman Talk 03:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)