Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SJSF-2-Bot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol delete vote.svg Denied.

SJSF-2-Bot
Operator: S-J-S-F-M-W

Automatic or Manually assisted: This bot will be manually assisted.

Programming language(s): Java.

Source code available: There are no plans to release source code for this bot at the following time.

Function overview: Basic clean-up bot for my user space, you know nothing too special.

Edit period(s): I am giving this a one time run because it is a prototype of my previous failed experiment that almost costed my account in the process.

Estimated number of pages affected: Just one.

Exclusion compliant (Y/N):Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):N

Function details:

Discussion
If this bot is manual (i.e. only semi-automated, in that every edit is checked by a human), and it only effects your userspace, then there is not really a need for this BRfA. Could you confirm that I am correct that this is semi-automated, and effects only your own userspace? Best - Kingpin13 (talk) 20:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I haven't really had the time to test the little guy since the sock puppet incident but if you are asking me to let the bot edit my page then I might as well give the commands. S-J-S-F-M-W (talk) 20:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The bot made an test execute on my page. S-J-S-F-M-W (talk) 20:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, please answer these questions, yes or no; Is the only page it will ever edit your own userpage? Are you checking the edits are all right before saving them? Thanks, - Kingpin13 (talk) 20:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes my user page will be the only thing it touches and the same goes for the edits. S-J-S-F-M-W (talk) 00:47, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * What does "clean up for my userspace mean"? What is the bot going to do? And why is it necessary to have a bot for this (from what I can tell, you only have three pages in your userspace, not counting your userpage). r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 19:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * This new editor's first edits included some significant vandalism. I would suggest going slow before approving anything. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, and there is also this ridiculous, offensive POV statement. Not vandalism, but enough to make you question whether this editor can be trusted with a bot. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 20:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I will assure you all that I will take full blame if this bot does go out of control. wat 23:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, will you actually bother to answer my questions above? Will you provide any details at all on what your bot is intended to do, and why it is necessary? r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 23:12, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I am answering to one right now, my bot is intended to just be my personal cleaning bot, and this request is necessary just to get the damn bot the right to edit. wat 01:08, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * CODE_EXECUTE_RFBA_VALUE = false. SJSF-2-Bot (talk) 01:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Doesn't everyone enjoy broken coding? wat 01:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This still doesn't explain what your bot is going to do. As you have not offered a satisfactory explanation for what your bot will do or for why a bot is necessary to do it, I have no choice but to oppose this request. Also, because you just made another edit with another unapproved bot, I have half a mind to block you as well until you agree to stop editing with unapproved bots. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 01:25, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The bot didn't meant to edit this page except creating a sub page showing the details of the code that it executes. wat 01:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * When asked to explain how your bot is going to work, it's better that you do that yourself, rather than having your unapproved bot do it for you. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 01:34, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * wat? wat 01:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

, a few points: Sorry, there are just too many concerns. -- Chris 01:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) If it is manually assisted and only editing user space you don't need approval
 * 2) You have repeatedly failed to answer questions about the bots function and show no intention of doing so ("Basic clean-up bot for my user space, you know nothing too special." is not an acceptable description)
 * 3) This edit, sets alarm bells ringing - no bot coder in their right mind would write in something that does that, which leads me to the assumption that you made the edit yourself which makes me question your motives and whether you can be trusted with a bot flag.
 * 4) A large amount of recent warnings on your talkpage + you were accused of sock puppetry only 2 days ago
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.