Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Snaevar-bot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved

Snaevar-bot
Operator:

Time filed: 08:44, Thursday May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Automatic or Manual: Manual

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: pywikipedia

Function overview: interwiki bot with nn.wikipedia.org as homewiki

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): none

Edit period(s): Daily

Estimated number of pages affected: 1056

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function details: Scans the main article space at nn.wikipedia.org using the -async and -array:60 parameter, fixing any interwiki conflicts manually.

Discussion
Make sure you read WP:INTERWIKIBOT. What is semi-automatic -- do you mean it is automatic but manually started? Which namespaces will you edit? What pywikipedia options are you using? — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 11:04, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

D — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 13:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC) D I'm going to expire this later in the week unless we hear back.  MBisanz  talk 23:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Copied from Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval:

I am requesting to reopen the BRFA for Snaevar-bot. As an answer to Hellknow´s question, my bot is a manual one and uses the -async parameter, running in the main article space. Finally, the Request needs to be changed so it reflects that the bot currently runs from nn.wiki, but not is.wiki.--Snaevar (talk) 18:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Please make any appropriate changes to the fields. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 19:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Done doing the appropriate changes.--Snaevar (talk) 16:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

— HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 17:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 50 edits done.--Snaevar (talk) 21:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

— HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 07:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.