Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SoxBot 5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol oppose vote.svg Withdrawn by operator.

SoxBot
Operator:  Soxred93 | talk bot

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): AWB

Function Summary: Per BOTREQ, wikiproject tagging. (big surprise).

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One time run.

Edit rate requested: 10 epm

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: See summary

Discussion

 * Seems straightforward, trustworthy botop, and all. Not sure if you'll get 10epm out of AWB, but yeah, No big deal. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 02:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Once, when I wasn't paying enough attention to how fast I was going, I managed to get more than 14 epm out of AWB for a bit. So yes, it is possible.-- Dycedarg  ж  08:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Anybody object to a trial run? — Werdna talk 00:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm a bit worried about its edits like. It says it probably fixed typos. Automatically. On talk pages. Eeek! Max S em(Han shot first!) 05:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That was when I pressed the wrong button for AWB.  Soxred93 | talk bot 02:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * None here, MaxSem? SQL Query me!  00:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹoɟʇs (st47) 20:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Have you run this task on trial yet? SQL Query me!  05:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Apparently, I read the request wrong, and I don't know how to do it with AWB. Soxred93 16:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.