Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TFAProtectorBot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol delete vote.svg Denied.

TFAProtectorBot
Operator:

Automatic or Manually assisted: automatic

Programming language(s): C

Source code available: n/a

Function overview: Move-protect the TFA for today and tomorrow

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Bots/Requests for approval/MUPloadBot 3

Edit period(s): daily

Estimated number of pages affected: 1, and that's the TFA

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): N (one page effected)

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function details: Move-protect the TFA for 2 days (today and the next day). I separated this from SpeakerBot and used a different password.

Other comments: I know this adminbot is coming from a non-admin. That is not a reason to reject this bot.

Discussion
Policy states you must have the admin bit to get the admin bit for your bot CrimsonBlue (talk) 21:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid Crimson is correct, an admin bot being run by a non-admin is actually a reason to decline (please make sure you read the bot policy carefully before submitting requests). If you find an admin to run this, that may be acceptable, but you would need to not know the password to the admin account - Kingpin13 (talk) 21:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.