Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TamizhBOT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol delete vote.svg Denied

TamizhBOT
Operator:

Time filed: 24 January 2016, 19:42

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: Standard pywikipedia

Function overview: fixing double redirect

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): daily.

Estimated number of pages affected: -.

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): n/a (will only be editing it's "own" pages).

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): yes @si.wikipedia.org and ta.wikipedia.org (Native)

Function details: fixing double redirect using redirect.py

Discussion

 * This bot appears to have edited since this BRFA was filed. Bots may not edit outside their own or their operator's userspace unless approved or approved for trial. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment This bot appears to have over 200 mainspace edits and is currently running at about six edits per minute. Is it an approved bot? – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No, it is not approved. has blocked it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 06:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not looked in depth at the quality of the bot's edits, just blocked because it is an unapproved bot editing outside of Maathavan's userspace. Feel free to overturn the block without consulting me if/when the bot is approved for a trial run. GorillaWarfare (talk) 06:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That is a lot of edits (and I see it's now been blocked...)—the real question is, why aren't these pages caught by or others? —  Earwig   talk  06:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately, you don't appear to have enough experience here on English Wikipedia. Please come back when you have more experience. Max Semenik (talk) 07:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.