Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TinucherianBot 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

TinucherianBot 3
Operator: --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) -

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic ( With manual supervision)

Programming Language(s): AutoWikiBrowser and Kingbotk Plugin

Function Summary: WikiProject tagging.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): On request especially at Bot requests page.

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: BRFA 1 was specific for WP India Tagging for INDIA. This is for any general project tagging request at Bot requests page. Action is simple :- Bot takes a category. Bot loads an article list and converts all to talk. Bot tags articles using the kingbotk plugin with Generic templates option. To be safe it will not run for categories recursively. The requester has to provide the end node category(s) for the article list collection.

Discussion
Does anybody have any objections? If not I think this can be speedy approved. BJ Talk 23:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * As long as it doesn't go recursively, which usually leads to disaster, it should be fine. Mr.Z-man 23:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Recursive is fine, as long as you dont go too deep ;). As of current svn snapshots, AWB has more list making functions, to go recursive, but not so deep, to reduce problems! (Note my COI for this task (AWB and plugin), so cannot approved). Low trial only needed —  Ree  dy  09:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)




 * Due to the easy find of articles to be tagged. I am using another project I am part of :-WikiProject Computing . The project banner is WikiProject Computing --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 13:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ . Trial completed. See Special:Contributions/TinucherianBot --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 14:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

BAGAssistanceNeeded

BJ Talk 16:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.