Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/UltraBot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

UltraBot
Operator: Junaidpv

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: standard pywikipedia framework

Function overview: interwiki purpose

Edit period(s): few edits per day

Estimated number of pages affected:

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Not yet

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): No

Function details: Just interwiki only

Discussion
Is this running on any other wikis? If so, ENWP allows Global Bots for interwiki-only work and does not require seperate approval. Q T C 07:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Currently, this bot doesn't have a global flag. --Erwin (talk) 08:39, 30 August 2009 (UTC)


 * that is what I have tried before, but because of this bot only started few weeks ago, they rejected the request :( --UltraBot (talk) 09:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Side note: You should be editing as you, not the bot. Q T C 12:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * ok --Junaid (talk) 07:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You might look at resolving Monoicous/Monoecious. I sorted it out some months back but it seems other wikis keep re-adding bad links. Rich Farmbrough, 09:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC).
 * Well I went to see what had happened and fixed it. But it would be good if we could keep it fixed without using nobots on the article, because all the other wiki';s have incorrect links (when it goes wrong). Rich Farmbrough, 10:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC).
 * Do you need a bot flag if it's a few edits a day? Rich Farmbrough, 10:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC).
 * few edits means up to what number? here i am going to do with interwiki only. some day it may do more edits, but most of time it will do few edits only --195.229.235.38 (talk) 09:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC) really sorry for not being logged in while leaving last comment, just now only I noticed it :( --Junaid (talk) 06:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Mr.Z-man 00:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Any progress? Anomie⚔ 03:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)


 * User hasn't edited en.wiki since mid-November, although they are active at ml.wiki. I left a note on their talk page at ml; hopefully they will come here to comment. If they don't finish the trial soon, I would consider expiring this request. &mdash; The   Earwig   @  17:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry for not completing the trial. Because of other bots always overtaking me, I am not getting enough chance to work on interwiki link. Anyway i will try this week, if I not complete trial after this week, you can remove me this request. --Junaid (talk) 03:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It appears that trials have just started, and are progressing slowly. Josh Parris 00:58, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Now I have completed 50 trial edits --Junaid (talk) 04:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

looks good.  MBisanz  talk 01:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.