Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/WOSlinkerBot 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

WOSlinkerBot 3
Operator:

Time filed: 19:59, Saturday, December 29, 2018 (UTC)

Function overview: Substitutes,  and  on users talk pages with the correct collaboration at the time of posting.

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Manual

Programming language(s): Javascript

Source code available: At User:WOSlinkerBot/collab-science.js

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): one time run

Estimated number of pages affected: between 100 and 200

Namespace(s): User Talk pages and archives

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Function details: Substitutes,  and  on users talk pages with the correct collaboration at the time of posting, rather than showing the current collaboration (which is out of date anyway and also causes lint errors since it changed over time from a single link to a notice box).

Discussion

 * Please demonstrate with at least 2 different old versions of this usage. — xaosflux  Talk 14:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I've done the 20 edits, . While doing the trial edits, I noitced another template, Template:SCOTMvoter, which should be substituted as well, so I'd like to expand the scope to include this as well. There are 26 occurences of this . Would you like me to do 5 trial edits for this one? -- WOSlinker (talk) 13:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * OK. — xaosflux  Talk 14:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I've done the extra 5 edits, . These were all done manually as not all those posts had an timestamp with them, so I had to compare the ones either side or look back at the history of the pages to workout the relevant date. -- WOSlinker (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Task approved, be sure to always use minor on these. — xaosflux  Talk 00:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.