Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Yobot 13


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svg Approved.

Yobot 13
Operator: Magioladitis

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic, supervised

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: It's AWB auto-tagger. Code is available

Function overview:


 * Auto-tagging of uncategorized articles found in toolserver. Tagging/untagging will include all AWB's taggers.


 * NEWSFLASH! Generalised function after discussion: Auto-tagging by request running in selected lists. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Per request in Bot_requests. It turns out that various bot have been doing similar tasks in the past but discontinued. Per Bots/Requests for approval/Yobot 11, Yobot is already using auto-tagger in other categories without any problem.

Edit period(s): Often

Estimated number of pages affected: ~13,000 articles in first run.

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function details: AWB's auto-tagger will be activated. Pages will be loaded from toolserver. Auto-tagger includes various tags like: orphan, wikify, stub, ibid, etc. Orphan tagging will be restricted to linkless pages according to nowadays demands.

General fixes is a question. I can run it with genfixes off. A recent discussion concluded that we can activate genfixes if we make certain restrictions. I am ok both ways (genfixes can be limited only if tagging is performed). I have reorganised AWB's bug page so that we have an overview of all the known bugs for bth auto-tagger and genfixes.

-- Magioladitis (talk) 23:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

 * I made a list a few months ago of articles that use Ibid as a reference. See here. Tim1357 (talk) 23:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Nice. I hope that in the future AWB will be able to fix some of these cases automatically. I can use AWB to tag these article if you want. I noticed some of them are not tagged with Ibid. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to run with limited genfixes enabled. &mdash; The Earwig   (talk)  19:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * (25 April 2010 22:19-22:29). Everything went as expected. I limited the genfixes by not doing Manual of style fixes and I had "Skip if not Auto-tagging" turned on. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I could extend this bot run to article lacking Ibid based on the list given above, if they are no disagreements. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:54, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I could make a bot to help this situation too. I updated the function request to generalise it. did 50 extra test edits (from 22:00, 2 May 2010 to 22:05, 2 May 2010) -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

BAGAssistanceNeeded I think we can close this as "approved". -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Please provide a link to edits performed in the trial. Josh Parris 09:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * First run (main task to add uncategorised):, , , , , , , , , , , , for more check the timestamps I gave above.
 * Second run (main task to deal with expand tag):, , , , , , , for more check the timestamps I gave above.
 * Maybe should be replaced with expand-section instead of being removed? -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I had a second thought in the last one: I think we have to stick to the rule "if stub remove expand". -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Regarding that particular edit, it removed an expand template from a section, leaving the section without text. In this particular case it appears that the expand has been used when expand section or even empty section ought to have been. Correct as you see fit. Josh Parris 14:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Josh Parris 14:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.