Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Yobot 18


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol keep vote.svgSymbol support vote.svg Speedily Approved.

Yobot 18
Operator: Magioladitis

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic, supervised for most of the edits

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: No. I can provide it if requested but there nothing to see here.

Function overview: changes all transclusions of or  to

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Bot_requests and Bots/Requests for approval/KarlsenBot 3

Edit period(s): Continuous

Estimated number of pages affected: 11,000

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes

Function details: from the bot request by Mechamind90: "When an image is tagged with or on both English Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Commons, the Wikipedia templates are each practically identical to their Commons counterpart. However, when an image is just tagged with, it means 100 on Wikipedia but 70 on the Commons. Perhaps on Wikipedia this can be resolved, since it's probably a hassle for Commons users to replace 70-year with 100-year" when public domain images are copied from Wikipedia to Commons, which is a frequent practice for all free-content images that are initially uploaded locally. Therefore, every transclusion of or  on an image will be converted to. (, presently a redirect to, will become a high-risk template as a result, and should be fully protected.)

Task was previously approved for KarlsenBot which was blocked recently. Check Bots/Requests for approval/KarlsenBot 3.

Discussion
Task was already approved for a different bot, op is experienced in doing this sort of thing, and the general approval for replacing templates in Bots/Requests for approval/Yobot 15 may already cover it anyway. Anomie⚔ 02:29, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.