Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/rezabot 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Symbol oppose vote.svg Withdrawn by operator.

rezabot 2
Operator:

Time filed: 11:20, Friday May 10, 2013 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: wikidata:User:Reza1615/BOT/new_interwiki.py

Function overview: removing existed interwikis from local wiki (en.wiki) and add them to the item also it adds Interwiki conflict like this for fa.wiki to pages which have interwiki-conflict. this code is test in some wikis such as (fa, ar, hu, ckb, ur) and works fine.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): At the first it will work for this list (enwiki.txt) and finally it will work on new articles and new categories daily like: like here or here

Estimated number of pages affected: Unknown. it will work daily

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): yes for interwiki.py also my bot is global bot

Function details: My bot has flag on wikidata to update intewikis and it works fine. Now it works in fa.wiki and it added pages wiki have confilict to fa:رده:صفحه‌های دارای تداخل میان‌ویکی and users can edit that pages to solving the confilicts faster :) Yamaha5 (talk) 11:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Cases :here is the bot works

Discussion

 * I'd like User:Addshore's input on this.  MBisanz  talk 04:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I will quickly link to this which as far as I can tell has the lists of articles you are trying to create without having to add a tracker template to thousands of pages. My bot is already and still constantly scanning every page in every list waiting for wikidata items to be created for them or for links to be added to wikidata. I don't see much point in duplicating the task but would prefer not to take action on this approval request myself. Back to you User:MBisanz  ·Add§hore·  Talk To Me! 20:06, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * the difference between my bot and yours is:
 * some of wikis like tl.wikipedia or os.wikipedia they changed their namespace aliases so bots can not detect them.
 * your bot doesn't show pages which doesn't have item but mine add pages to none-item category so users can merge or redirect that pages.
 * in my opinion it is not duplicate and my bot complete yours.
 * in another point my is not only link remover it adds interwikis to wikidata also solve some kind of item conflicts Yamaha5 (talk) 21:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a long-term ongoing task, I see no reason not to have two bots. Wikipedia is volunteer and anonymous, if the bot is useful, having a second or backup bot or bot that deals with different Wikipedias not addressed by first bot is good idea. I think this should be tested. -166.137.209.143 (talk) 13:50, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree redundancy is a good thing. I'm not sure though if we want a bot adding the template, which predates wikidata.  MBisanz  talk 10:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * How are interwiki conflicts handled? Yes, if the template is no longer used, it should not be added. -166.137.209.146 (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 *  ·addshore·  talk to me! 11:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * as you prefer I withdrawal Yamaha5 (talk) 10:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Per comment above. -- Chris 12:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.