Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Articles that need pictures

The following discussion comes from Categories for deletion. This is an archive of the discussion only; please do not edit this page. -Kbdank71 20:38, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Category:Articles that need pictures
Misguided category created by User:SamuraiClinton, a user who is creating a significant amount of cleanup work for other editors. We already have Requested pictures, which makes this category redundant. Rhobite 02:36, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this category, it is useful! --GoofyGuy 02:44, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * It is completely redundant! Why did you create it? Rhobite 02:49, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Some categories can help link people to articles that need pictures; especially when there is a template to inform them! --GoofyGuy 03:06, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * What's wrong with Requested pictures? It's organized by topic and it's already full of articles. Rhobite 03:08, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep since a viewer of a page is likely to notice the category than hit "what links here" and see it's linked by the page requesting images. Cburnett 05:28, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Requested pictures is a better system, divided by topic. &#8212;Mar·ka·ci: 2005-03-11 13:29 Z
 * Delete because it's too messy to follow with this and Requested pictures and Image:No image yet and who knows what else. --iMb~Mw 13:47, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Might be useful, but has the potential to become huge (the vast majority of articles could use more pictures). I envision a WikiProject Articles that need pictures sorting in the future. --SPUI (talk) 01:05, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant and intrusive. It's like a cleanup tag, only... not?  -Sean Curtin 05:52, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Requested pictures already does an adequate job. Megan1967 02:10, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)