Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Octogenarians

The following discussion comes from Categories for deletion. This is an archive of the discussion only; please do not edit this page. -Kbdank71 19:51, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Category:Octogenarians

 * I'm somewhat surprised by the fact that Category:Nonagenarians turned out to be considered useless and thus deleted but this category did not. Any opinions on whether this is a useful category?? Georgia guy 21:16, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Hard to maintain. Not useful info - there's already a category for birth years. Do people who died in their 80's count? Or are they "former octogenarians"? -Willmcw 22:09, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the same arguments that played into the Nonagenarian category being deleted apply here. Courtland 23:20, 2005 Mar 10 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is too broad for even a list to be particularly useful. -Aranel (" Sarah ") 23:25, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Same reasons as Nonagenarians.  -Kbdank71 14:53, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's hard enough with all the catergories there are now. Ted Wilkes 19:48, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)