Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Pub stub

The following discussion comes from Categories for deletion, where it is currently listed as unresolved. It may be reviewed again in the future in the light of evolving standards and guidelines for categorization. 22:15, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Category:Pub stub
This category and its counterpart Template:Pub-stub should be deleted because there is something much more useful: Category:Buildings and structures stubs and Template:Struct-stub --AllyUnion (talk) 10:40, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Why is it better to have a wider stub category in this case? Isn't in normally better to have as narrow categories as possible? JesseW 12:57, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * DELETE, that said let me address Jesse's point. We dont want narrow stub categories because then we would end up with stubs for english pub, one for german pub, one for irish pub, etc... which to me seems rather pointless, when a stub for building/structure related articles covers all of these gracefully. Its one thing to have a Bio stub and a Geography stub as these are different fields but eventually you get so narrow as to become specific to only 1 article name. Alkivar 21:46, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Thank you for clarifying that. -- AllyUnion (talk) 18:44, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)