Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Republic of Singapore Navy naval bases

The following discussion comes from Categories for deletion. This is an archive of the discussion only; please do not edit this page. -Kbdank71 14:17, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Category:Republic_of_Singapore_Navy_naval_bases

 * Delete The Republic of Singapore Navy has only two bases. This category is small and has little potential for growth. --Travisyoung 00:50, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Summary after 2 weeks &mdash; no consensus=> move to /unresolved
 * 1 Delete: Travisyoung
 * 2 Keep: Instantnood; MadreBurro


 * Comment Er... and you removed the article in the category before submitting this? Anyway there is potential for a full set of categories of naval bases arranged by country in the Navy bases category, much in line with that created for air forces and armies.--Huaiwei 11:13, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Category to be deleted was non-controversial, I removed the article (the one and only article that was present) from the category following instructions from point 4 above. A cfd tag was placed as well. Travisyoung 18:44, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment If you are referring to point 4, it says you should clear the category only if it is a case of vandalism or a duplicate.--Huaiwei 03:21, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment But point 4 says, "[u]nless the category to be deleted is non-controversial... please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision." In any case, I took it that the category to be deleted was non-controversial. Please correct me if I interpreted it wrongly. --Travisyoung 09:57, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Tentative keep. &mdash; Instantnood 08:59, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep ONLY if someone grows the category. MadreBurro 17:54, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I think the article that was removed should be added back to the category as a matter of good faith; the "non-controversial" nature of the nomination was obviously not a correct assumption. Courtland 06:21, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)